Resources| Vol. 6, No. 1 January 2002 |
A Look at How Agencies Can Utilize Outcome and Performance Data To Enhance Service Delivery
Background
Increasingly states and localities are seeking to
improve program outcomes. They
are developing new methods of documentation, evaluation, accountability
and reporting.
The downturn of America’s economy and shrinking
state and local resources are raising concern about how human service
agencies will respond to the needs of the low-income population.
As caseloads continue to rise, expenditures will increase and human
service agencies will need to evaluate programs and appraise the ways in
which they can maximize service deliverables to respond to the increasing
needs of the low-income and welfare population within financial
constraints.
This
Resource for Welfare Decisions will focus on a variety of performance
measurement and outcome data resources as they relate to evaluating
service delivery performance in areas that include employment
(welfare-to-work and performance bonuses for work participation), and
child welfare, as well as some general TANF program areas.
This Resource will also look at the challenges of effective
performance evaluation across different types of agencies—government,
non-profit, and for-profit.
For more information regarding performance
measurement, refer to the Welfare Information Network’s (WIN)
performance management page at http://www.welfareinfo.org/performance.asp.
For information on research and evaluation, see WIIN’s Research,
Reference and Data Resources page at http://www.welfareinfo.org/homeresearch.asp.
The Finance Project also has a website devoted to information
around better results for children, families and communities.
Visit the web page at http://www.financeproject.org/betterresults.htm.
Publications and Electronic Resources
The Annie E. Casey Foundation and the National
Academy of Public Administration, High Performance Partnership,
2001. This project supports
the use of high performance partnerships among public, nonprofit, and
civic organizations. The
first phase will develop a resource guide that documents the current state
of high performance public/nonprofit partnerships and identifies relevant
trends and best practices. The
second phase involves the construction of design laboratories in
communities that have actually established high performance partnerships
with local government, civic and nonprofit entities.
Contact Anne
Shackleton at 202/347-3190.
The Department of Labor and Mathematica Policy
Research, Inc., Welfare-to-Work Performance and Reporting Tools Available to Grantees,
December 2001. This project
includes reporting and performance technical specifications, reporting and
performance software, and a data elements validation guide. http://wtw.doleta.gov/
Fairfax County Department of Systems Management for
Human Services and the Department of Administration for Human Services, Fairfax
County Human Services Response to Challenges in the Community (FY 1999
Performance Budget), 1999. Contact
the Department of Systems Management for Human Services at 703/324-5638. http://www.co.fairfax.va.us/service/reports/99prfbud.htm
The Finance Project, the National Governors
Association and Families and Work Institute, Using Results to Improve
the Lives of Children and Families: A Guide for Public-Private Child Care
Partnerships, 2001. http://nccic.org/ccpartnerships/resource.htm#resultspdf
Forsythe, Dall, Quicker, Better, Cheaper? Managing
Performance in American Government, Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of
Government, 2001. See Federalism
and Performance Management: Health Insurance, Food Stamps and the Take-Up
Challenge at http://www.rockinst.org/publications/federalism/QuickerBetterCheaperChapter3.pdf
and Getting Performance Measures to Measure Up at http://www.rockinst.org/publications/federalism/QuickerBetterCheaperChapter9.pdf.
The United Way of America, Agency Experiences with
Outcome Measurement, 2000. One
report in a 3-year long project entitled, “The National Learning
Project,” that takes a look at ways in which the United Way can use
outcome measurement information to improve programs and initiatives. For a copy of the study, contact The United Way of America at
(703) 836-7100.
The United Way of America, Outcome Measurement
Data Management Systems for Agencies, 2001. This report illustrates
several software and database management tools for agencies to manage
data. Contact Roger Wood at roger.wood@uwa.unitedway.org.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Developing
A System of Program Accountability Under the John H. Chafee Foster Care
Independence Program, Children’s Bureau, September 2001.
The program operates under three basic premises: develop outcome
measurements, identify the data elements needed to track services, and
develop and implement a plan to collect the information.
http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/cb/programs/cfcip_act.htm
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Report on Alternative Outcome Measures: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Block
Grant, December
2000.
What States/Agencies
are Doing
The Alabama Department of Human Services- has
created a multi-tiered quality control system that provides a structured
method of program analysis. The
system monitors, evaluates and provides feedback on several programs and
services under the agency’s scope.
The department conducts a continuous review process that evaluates
the outcomes of children and families receiving programs/assistance,
analyzes the department current systems, monitors programs for federal
compliance, and recommends restructuring programs and services that are
not operating efficiently. The
Quality Assurance System is a collaborative effort of several
departments—Office of Quality Assurance in the Family Services Division,
State Quality Assurance Committee, Quality Assurance Coordinator in each
County Department and Local Quality Assurance Committees.
Call The Family Services Division at 334/242-9500.
See http://www.dhr.state.al.us/fsd.qa.asp
The Arizona Department of Health and Human
Services has a 2000-2001 Master List of State Government Programs report
that reflects several aspects of the agency’s overall operations, such
as budgeting, funds allocation, program analysis, performance measurement
and mission statements. See http://www.state.az.us/ospb/mlist/hsa.pdf.
The Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for
Families and Children has created the Office of Performance Enhancement.
The Division of Outcome Based Contracts handles most of the
contracting in child welfare service.
In the Division of Quality Improvement, a quality control unit
handles the monitoring of public assistance programs and Food Stamps; a
quality initiatives unit handles caseworker and site reviews and appeals
filed by clients, and a contracts accountability unit monitors all of the
contracts held by the agency to ensure compliance with federal guidelines.
There are also 2000 and 2001 Outcome Measurement Reports available.
The reports helped to expedite and improve children’s placement
in programs and services, to facilitate customer and client feedback, and
to develop innovative data management and collection tools.
For more information on the Office of Performance Enhancement,
contact Mark Neff or see http://cfc.state.ky.us/agencies/Performance_Enh/index.asp.
For more information on the Outcome Reports, contact Gary Harp or
see http://cfc.state.ky.us/outcomes2000/.
Both can be reached at 502/564-6750.
New York City’s Human
Resources Administration’s Citywide Accountability Program (CAP) generates monthly reports that
reflect key indicators of the city’s welfare caseload such as: reported
job placement rate, 3-month recidivism for employed TANF cases returning
to welfare, fair hearing win rate, public assistance caseload change rate,
public assistance city dependency rate and public assistance benefits
expended. These indicators
and the accompanying table can be found at http://www.nyc.gov/html/hra/html/news_citywide.html.
The Human Resource Administration also developed the JobStat
program in 1998. JobStat is a
performance management support program for city job centers.
JobStat generates the JobStat report that is used by senior level
managers to analyze overall and individual center performance.
More detailed information about the JobStat report can be found at http://www.nyc.gov/html/hra/pdf/jobstatguide2.0.pdf.
There are also additional reports available that reflect each of
the Job Centers JobStat monthly reports.
Visit http://www.nyc.gov/html/html/center_job_stat.html.
Oklahoma
Milestone Payment System
utilizes a performance based reimbursement system as an incentive for
improved service delivery and outcomes in employment initiatives.
This program was developed by the Community Rehabilitation Services
Unit of the Oklahoma Department of Rehabilitation Services. The
reimbursement system is based on outcomes for the consumer.
Contact Dan O’Brien, Rehabilitation Staff, at 405/951-3479 or
Becky Cook 405/951-3474. http://www.onenet.net/~home/milestone.
Resource Contacts
Alliance for Redesigning Government, 202/347-3190, or
visit,
American Society for Public Administration’s Center
for Accountability and Performance, 757/ 462-8286, or visit http://www.aspanet.org/cap.
Center for Collaboration of Children, 714/278-2166,
or visit http://hdcs.fullerton.edu/cc/.
Center for the Study of Social Policy, 202/371-1565,
or visit http://www.clasp.org.
The Child and Family Policy Center, 515/280-9027, or
visit http://www.cfpciowa.org/.
Evaluation Forum, 206/728.8984, or visit http://www.evaluationforum.com.
The Finance Project, 202/587-1000, or visit http://www.financeproject.org.
Foundation Consortium, 916/646-3646, or visit http://www.foundationconsortium.org/home.htm.
The Rockefeller Institute for Government,
518/443-5522, or visit http://www.rockinst.org.
The United Way—Outcome Resource Measurement
Network, 703/836-7100, or visit
Register
on line at www.enterprisefoundation.org
http://www.enterprisefoundation.org/
Question? Call the conference hotline at 410/772-2760 or email us at workforceconf@enterprisefoundation.org.