Vol. 6, No. 9                                                                                                                   December 2002
Work Supports for Low-Income Working Families
 
Nanette Relave
 
Background
 
Work support programs complement the efforts of welfare and workforce development agencies to move low-income individuals into jobs. These federal, state, and local programs encourage employment, promote job retention, and help working families make ends meet by addressing workplace issues, assisting with work and family needs, and increasing family income. Some stakeholders are more inclusive than others when defining what constitutes a work support. Examples of work supports include the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), food stamps, child care subsidies, transportation assistance, paid leave benefits, Medicaid, the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), and earnings supplements such as earned income disregards and cash payments to working families.
 
The public sector has been expanding work support programs since the mid-1980s. EITC expansions, for example, have made the tax credit a pivotal work support because of its antipoverty and work incentive effects. Work supports received a significant boost from the 1996 welfare reform legislation that allows states and localities to use Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) funds to assist low-income working families. Under the new farm bill, states may improve eligible working families’ access to food stamps. State budget shortfalls, however, are threatening some of the progress that has been made in making work supports available to low-income working families.
 
Despite the growth of work support programs, low-income working families face challenges in accessing assistance. This Issue Note explores the access issue and describes strategies to help low-income working families access work supports notwithstanding current fiscal constraints. For more information, visit the Welfare Information Network (WIN) web page on Work Supports at http://www.financeproject.org/workforce_worksupports.asp.  For more information on the various work support programs, visit the WIN web site at http://www.welfareinfo.org/.  Also visit the Making Wages Work web site, which focuses on work supports that supplement wages and income, at http://www.makingwageswork.org/.
 
Policy and Program Issues
 
How can work supports help welfare and workforce development agencies meet policy and program goals? Welfare and workforce development agencies aim to move clients into employment, and job retention is an essential outcome. Work supports encourage employment and promote job retention, because they provide incentives for people to take jobs and help stabilize family income as families move from welfare or unemployment into work. Work supports help keep earnings from being completely offset by lost benefits and thus change the income calculus for entry-level work. By helping to address certain employment barriers, work supports make it easier for clients to stay employed, a critical first step toward achieving self-sufficiency.
 
Research indicates that families that use transitional support services such as food stamps, child care subsidies, and help with expenses are less likely to return to welfare. By providing work supports to low-income families that have not received cash assistance, welfare agencies may be able to help these families stay off the rolls. Increasing family income, which agencies can accomplish through work supports and earnings supplements, can improve family and child outcomes as well as increase employment and job retention rates.
 
Connecting clients to work supports is important to workforce development agencies and one-stop career centers, which serve welfare recipients, the working poor, and other low-income working families with multiple needs. The Workforce Investment Act authorizes the provision of supportive services to assist clients receiving employment and training services.
 
Programs that encourage work can be more cost-effective ways to reduce poverty than programs that keep clients dependent on public assistance. According to Sawhill and Thomas, a dollar spent on a work support program can generate more than a dollar of income if the program can elicit a sufficiently large labor supply response from recipients. As clients receive more earnings through work, they generate tax revenue and draw down less in benefits. For more information, see Isabel Sawhill and Adam Thomas, A Hand Up for the Bottom Third: Toward a New Agenda for Low-Income Working Families (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, May 2001), at
http://www.brook.edu/views/papers/sawhill/20010522.htm.
 
What benefits can work supports provide to low-income working families and employers? Characteristics of the low-wage labor market often make it difficult for working families to sustain employment and make ends meet. Low-wage jobs are more likely than higher wage jobs to lack flexibility, job-related benefits, and paid sick or vacation leave, and they are more likely to include nonstandard hours. Earnings from low-wage jobs frequently are insufficient to lift families out of poverty. For these reasons, low-wage workers can find it hard to meet family and work-related needs and expenses. Employers of low-wage workers may face costs in employee retention and productivity associated with absenteeism, late attendance, work disruption, and high turnover.
 
Work supports, by encouraging employment, supporting job retention, and helping families make ends meet, benefit working families and their employers. Work supports help families with work-related expenses such as child care and with family needs such as health insurance. These supports reduce costs for families and can increase family income. Increased family income is linked to improved family and child well-being. Work supports can even help workers take advantage of job training opportunities available through an employer. 

 

Work supports can help reduce turnover costs and improve employee productivity. Many employers cannot meet all the support services needs of their low-wage employees. It can be particularly difficult for small businesses to provide benefits to their low-wage workers. By helping connect workers to available supports, employers can take advantage of public and community programs to meet workforce needs. Employers who actively promote, and even help fund, work supports may enjoy greater employee loyalty and a more positive public image. Work supports can help level the playing field for small businesses by making benefits that a business could not otherwise afford to provide available to low-wage workers. 
 
What barriers do low-income working families face in accessing and using work supports? Despite the benefits work supports provide, participation among low-income working families in some work support programs is low. Working families face several barriers in accessing work supports. These barriers vary by state and locality and by the type of support. An overarching problem is that delivery systems often are not designed to serve parents in the workforce, even as human services agencies have been serving more working families. Major barriers to accessing work supports include a lack of awareness, burdensome application and recertification processes, a fragmented service delivery system, and limited service capacity.
What strategies can the public sector use to facilitate access to work supports? State and local welfare reform efforts are focusing greater attention on the needs of low-income working families and are developing innovative strategies to serve these families. Diverse strategies are needed to help families access and use work supports, from conducting more intensive outreach to building service capacity. Yet the current state fiscal crisis is threatening services to low-income working families.
 
The state budget situation is shaping decisions about expanding access to and eligibility for particular work support programs. Work supports, however, are key tools for helping welfare and workforce development agencies meet policy and program goals. In times of tight budgets, states and localities can still help ensure access to work supports with these strategies.

Given the value of work supports in promoting employment and job retention, public agencies can use the following strategies to help low-income working families take advantage of available work supports.

How can public agencies work with employers to provide work supports to low-income workers? Working with employers offers a valuable opportunity to reach low-income workers, including workers who have made the transition from welfare to work. Work supports benefit workers and their employers, so public agencies can make a sound economic argument for partnering on work supports. To connect with employers, agencies may find it helpful to work with state and local chambers of commerce and the one-stop career center system. Providing information that is easy to use and understand is critical when working with employers. Public agencies can work with employers in these ways.
Research Findings
 
A significant amount of research exists on individual work support programs. This research examines program participation and impacts on income, employment, and welfare use. The WIN web site at http://www.welfareinfo.org/ provides links to much of this research from its program and research web pages. Less research is available on work supports collectively and on their complex interactions.
 
Over the course of welfare reform, researchers have been paying attention to participation in key work support programs. Participation in the Medicaid and food stamp programs, for example, declined in the mid- to late 1990s. Welfare reform and a strong economy contributed to this decline. Recently program participation has increased because of the recession, increased enrollment in SCHIP, and improved access to the food stamp program. Yet participation remains low among working families that are potentially eligible for these work support programs. Barriers to accessing and using work support described earlier in this paper play a role in limiting participation. For more information, see LaDonna Pavetti, Kathleen Maloy, and Liz Schott, Promoting Medicaid and Food Stamp Participation: Establishing Eligibility Procedures That Support Participation and Meet Families’ Needs (Washington, D.C.: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., June 2002), at http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/PDFs/promotemedicaid.pdf.
 
Work supports are linked to positive employment outcomes and increased family income. See, for example, Nisha Patel, Mark Greenberg, Steve Savner, and Vicki Turetsky, Making Ends Meet: Six Programs That Help Working Families and Employers (Washington, D.C.: Center for Law and Social Policy, June 2002), at
http://www.clasp.org/DMS/Documents/1023218370.89/Making%20Ends%20Meet.pdf.  The report highlights research findings on financial security, job retention, and program participation for six work support programs. Programs with earnings supplements that increase employment and family income can improve outcomes, such as educational attainment, for children in elementary school grades. For more information, see the Making Wages Work web page on work incentives at http://www.makingwageswork.org/workinc.htm.
 
Work supports can lower rates of return to welfare. Loprest found that families using transitional support services such as child care, health insurance, and help with expenses were less likely to return to welfare, though relatively few families took advantage of these supports. For more information, see Pamela Loprest, Who Returns to Welfare? (Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute, September 2002), at http://www.urban.org/urlprint.cfm?ID=7849.
   
Innovative Practices
 
In response to long waiting lists for subsidized child care and to encourage businesses to help finance child care, the Florida legislature passed the Child Care Partnership Act in 1996. The act created the Child Care Executive Partnership (CCEP), an innovative strategy to increase the availability of child care subsidies for low-income working families. Through CCEP the state matches each dollar an employer contributes to child care for families that are income-eligible for state-subsidized child care. Employers can contribute by subsidizing their own eligible employees or by contributing to a purchasing pool that funds child care subsidies for families in the community. CCEP benefits all three parties. Employers benefit from improved morale and productivity and from less absenteeism and turnover. More low-income working families have access to affordable child care at lower cost. And the state is able to stretch limited child care dollars. The CCEP board, appointed by the governor, manages the partnership and contracts with local child care agencies that administer child care subsidies to implement the program. By serving on the board business leaders are involved in critical child care issues. For more information, contact Joel Rosen, chair, Child Care Executive Partnership Board, at 1-800-935-5635.
 
In September 2002 the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services approved the Illinois FamilyCare program, allowing the state to extend medical coverage to parents and caretakers of children in the state’s KidCare (SCHIP and Medicaid) program. FamilyCare was approved under the Bush administration’s Health Insurance Flexibility and Accountability demonstration initiative (visit http://www.cms.gov/hifa/ for more information). The first phase of FamilyCare extends medical coverage to parents with annual incomes at or below 49 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) who have KidCare-eligible children. Nearly 30,000 parents will be newly eligible for coverage. Illinois began approving new parents for coverage in October 2002. The FamilyCare program will be funded in fiscal 2003 with federal matching funds allotted to the state through Medicaid and SCHIP, allowing Illinois to extend this valuable work support to low-income families despite the current state budget situation. Over time, the state has the option to extend eligibility to cover parents with incomes up to 185 percent of the FPL. The timing of further expansions will depend on state resources and legislative approval. The federal waiver approving the FamilyCare program will also allow more families to access premium assistance to pay for private or employer-sponsored health insurance. For more information, contact the FamilyCare program, Illinois Department of Public Aid, at 217/524-7156; or visit http://www.kidcareillinois.com/html/familycare.htm.
 
The Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation (MDRC) is developing a National Work Support Center Demonstration. The demonstration will implement and test several concepts in six to eight sites nationwide. Under the demonstration the role of current workforce development agencies will be expanded to include serving low-wage workers in order to increase these workers’ access to retention and advancement services and to work support programs such as the EITC, Medicaid, food stamps, and subsidized child care. Unique elements of this demonstration will include a focus on delivering a cohesive package of services and work supports and a focus on serving low-wage workers regardless of whether they are TANF recipients. Work Support Centers may be housed in various institutions, with an emphasis on one-stop career centers, family resource centers, and community-based organizations, and evaluated for their effectiveness in helping low-income working families. MDRC has conducted numerous site visits to these potential institutional “homes” for Work Support Centers, and it is developing case studies of promising programs. A publication, written in partnership with the National Governors Association, will be available in early 2003 on the outcomes of this exploratory work. MDRC is seeking support to launch this demonstration project in 2003. For more information, contact Frieda Molina or John Wallace, Manpower Development Research Corporation, at 510/663-6372; or visit
http://www.mdrc.org/WorkingPoor/WorkSupportCenters.htm.
 
Various organizations have developed outreach and informational materials to help states and localities connect eligible individuals to work supports. For example, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities produces an annual EITC outreach kit. The 2002 kit is available at http://www.cbpp.org/eic2002/index.html.  The National League of Cities has created a Helping Working Families Action Kit for municipal leaders that highlights outreach strategies for work supports, available at http://www.nlc.org/nlc_org/site/files/reports/helpingworking.pdf.  The Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, provides food stamp informational materials – posters, flyers, and brochures – online, see http://www.fns.usda.gov/fsp/info.htm.  The Welfare to Work Partnership developed informational guides for employers interested in work supports, see http://www.welfaretowork.org/publications/smart_solutions.htm. Visit the WIN web site at http://www.welfareinfo.org/ for links to other outreach materials. 
 
The Tennessee Department of Human Services (DHS) has taken steps to make it easier for families to access and retain food stamps. DHS streamlined the application form to one page and made it available online. To increase program awareness, the department contracts with several nonprofit organizations to conduct food stamp outreach activities. These activities include conducting community education campaigns, distributing application packets at community sites, and prescreening potential applicants and assisting them with the application process. To improve food stamp participation among working families, the state took the semi-annual reporting option for households with earned income. This option allows states to collect information from working families every six months instead of more frequent intervals. In Tennessee this reporting requirement can be carried out over the telephone every other reporting period. [The new farm bill expands this option and gives states additional options to improve the participation of working families in the food stamp program. Information on the farm legislation is available from the Food Research and Action Center at http://www.frac.org/index.html.]  Tennessee also initiated a customer service review process for TANF case closures that reminds clients who have had their TANF cases closed that they may still be eligible for Medicaid, food stamps, and other benefits. For more information on Tennessee’s activities, contact Richard Dobbs, director, or Sandra Ramsey, program coordinator, Food Stamp Program, Tennessee Department of Human Services, at 615/313-5652.
 
TJX Companies, Inc.¾operator of T.J. Maxx, Marshalls, HomeGoods, and A.J. Wright¾has hired nearly 30,000 individuals from the welfare rolls since 1997. TJX understood the transition from welfare to work would not be an easy one for many individuals and developed innovative ways to ensure success, including partnering with service providers. The First Step Program, the company’s welfare-to-work program, resulted from a collaboration between TJX and Morgan Memorial Goodwill Industries in Boston. This program, which provides classroom training, internships, and job placement, currently operates in partnership with nonprofit community organizations in Chicago, Detroit, Boston, Philadelphia, Atlanta, and Puerto Rico.
 
Finding most of its hires were unaware of available government benefits, TJX partnered with federal and state agencies to start educating workers about these work supports. The company teamed up with the U.S. Department of Agriculture to educate TJX workers about food stamps, and it worked with the Internal Revenue Service to connect workers to available tax credits, including the EITC. TJX placed posters in each store with information on local volunteer income tax assistance sites. The company developed some of its own outreach materials on SCHIP to raise awareness of this program. A new outreach initiative will educate employees about state fuel assistance programs. TJX also works with Fannie Mae to provide its workers with valuable financial literacy education. The company offers on-the-job supports, including matching the new hires with mentors to help ease the transition from welfare to work. For more information on these and other initiatives to connect employees with valuable supports, contact Patrick Flavin, manager of government programs, TJX, at 508/390-3639; or visit http://www.tjx.com/frames/cr.html.
 
Work Central, a project of the nonprofit organization Connectinc., provides case management and resource information services to help former welfare clients stay employed and advance. These services are provided through a call center that serves nine counties in North Carolina. County departments of social services refer customers to Work Central. Individuals seeking assistance also initiate calls. Through telephone counseling and information and referral, Work Central staff work with customers on career development and advancement, financial planning and asset accumulation, and personal and family needs that may interfere with employment. Staff help customers connect with numerous support services, including key work supports such as the EITC and child care subsidies, and they provide intensive followup to ensure customers receive needed supports. An automated system enables staff to access information for customers on a real-time basis. Staff are available from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays to ensure access for working families. Connectinc. receives state funding, local TANF maintenance-of-effort funds, foundation funding, and support from businesses. In addition, the state employment security commission, in partnership with Connectinc., assigned a full-time staff person to Work Central who provides job leads and assists with employment activities. For more information, contact Jackie Savage, executive director, Connectinc., at 252/442-3265; or visit http://www.connectinc.org/.
 
For More Information…
 
Resource Contacts
 
The Brookings Institution, contact Isabel Sawhill or Molly Fifer, 202/797-6000; or visit http://www.brookings.edu/.
 
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, contact Heidi Goldberg, 202/408-1080; or visit http://www.cbpp.org/.
 
Center for Law and Social Policy, contact Nisha Patel, 202/906-8000; or visit http://www.clasp.org/.
 
The Lewin Group, contact Michael Fishman, 703/269-5500.
 
National Governors Association, contact Lisa Grossman, 202/624-5300; or visit
http://www.nga.org/center/1,1188,,00.html.
 
National Partnership for Women and Families, contact Jocelyn Frye or Jodi Grant, 202/986-2600; or visit http://www.nationalpartnership.org/index.cfm.
 
Welfare to Work Partnership, contact Robert Keast, 202/955-3005; or visit
http://www.welfaretowork.org/index.htm.
 
Publications
 
Adams, Gina, Kathleen Snyder, and Jodi R. Sandfort. Navigating the Child Care Subsidy System: Policies and Practices that Affect Access and Retention. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute, March 2002. Available at http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/310450.pdf.
 
Bravo, Ellen, Mark Greenberg, and Cindy Marano. Investing in Family Well-Being, a Family-Friendly Workplace and a More Stable Workforce: A “Win-Win” Approach to Welfare and Low-Wage Policy. New York, N.Y.: Ford Foundation, summer 2002. Available at
http://www.lowincomeworkingfamilies.org/pdfs/ford_policyfinal.pdf.
 
Fishman, Michael E., and Harold Beebout. Supports for Working Poor Families: A New Approach. Princeton, N.J.: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., December 2001. Available at
http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/PDFs/supportpoor.pdf.
 
Haskins, Ron. “Making Ends Meet: Challenges Facing Working Families in America.” Testimony before the House Committee on the Budget, on behalf of The Brookings Institution, August 1, 2001. Available at http://www.brook.edu/views/testimony/haskins/20010801.htm.
 
Heymann, Jody, Renee Boynton-Jarrett, Patricia Carter, James T. Bond, and Ellen Galinsky. Work-Family Issues and Low-Income Families. New York, N.Y.: Ford Foundation, summer 2002. Available at http://www.lowincomeworkingfamilies.org/pdfs/ford_analysisfinal.pdf.
 
Lazere, Ed, Shawn Fremstad, and Heidi Goldberg. States and Counties Are Taking Steps to Help Low-Income Working Families Make Ends Meet and Move Up the Economic Ladder. Washington, D.C.: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, May 2001. Available at http://www.cbpp.org/5-18-01wel.htm.
 
Loprest, Pamela J. Who Returns to Welfare? Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute, September 2002. Available at http://www.urban.org/urlprint.cfm?ID=7849.
 
Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation. Beyond Welfare and Work First: Building Services and Systems to Support California’s Working Poor and Hard-to-Place¾Conference Highlights. New York, N.Y.: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation, January 2001. Available at http://www.mdrc.org/Reports2001/CA-Conference/MDRC%20Sacramento%20Brochure.pdf.
 
National Partnership for Women and Families. Family Leave Benefits: A Menu of Policy Models for State and Local Policy Leaders. Washington, D.C.: National Partnership for Women and Families, September 2001. Available at
http://www.nationalpartnership.org/content.cfm?L1=8&L2=2.0&GSID=247.
 
Patel, Nisha, Mark Greenberg, Steve Savner, and Vicki Turetsky. Making Ends Meet: Six Programs That Help Working Families and Employers. Washington, D.C.: Center for Law and Social Policy, June 2002. Available at
http://www.clasp.org/DMS/Documents/1023218370.89/Making%20Ends%20Meet.pdf.
 
Pavetti, LaDonna, Kathleen Maloy, and Liz Schott. Promoting Medicaid and Food Stamp Participation: Establishing Eligibility Procedures That Support Participation and Meet Families’ Needs. Washington, D.C.: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., June 2002. Available at http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/PDFs/promotemedicaid.pdf.
 
Sawhill, Isabel, and Adam Thomas. A Hand Up for the Bottom Third: Toward a New Agenda for Low-Income Working Families. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, May 2001. Available at http://www.brook.edu/views/papers/sawhill/20010522.htm.
 
Sawhill, Isabel, and Ron Haskins. Welfare Reform and the Work Support System. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, March 2002. Available at
http://www.brookings.edu/dybdocroot/wrb/publications/pb/pb17.htm

 

The Welfare Information Network is supported by grants form the Annie E. Casey Foundation, the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Ford Foundation, and the Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.